Pragmatic Attitudes and Semantic Competence
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Pragmatic Attitudes and Semantic Competence
In this paper I argue against the account Soames offers in Beyond Rigidity of the semantics and pragmatics of propositional attitude reports. I defend a particular constraint for identifying semantic content of phrases based on conditions for semantic competence, and argue that failure of substitutivity is an essential component of our competence conditions with propositional attitude predicate...
متن کاملConverging towards what? Pragmatic and Semantic Competence
The paper tries to build a bridge between results in commonsense reasoning and inferential theories of meaning. We focus on the problem of communication and the contrast between two views of communication, the “expressive” view and the “convergence” view. According to the convergence view (and local holism which supports it) the meaning of a sentence is the set of inferences to which speakers c...
متن کاملPragmatic Reasoning. Pragmatic Semantics and Semantic Pragmatics
This paper is concerned with the conceptual foundations of pragmatic reasoning (context-dependent reasoning). A general pragmatic semantics (a semantic analysis which includes a pragmatic parameter) is given for pragmatic reasoning, the logical properties of the various forms of pragmatic reasoning are discussed, as are many examples. The semantic pragmatics (the general study of choosing or in...
متن کاملA Semantic and Pragmatic Framework for the Specification of Agent Communication Languages: Motivational Attitudes and Norms
The ability to communicate is one of the most important properties of agents. In an open environment, like the Internet, in which agents are designed in many different ways, it is important to clearly establish the meaning of a standard language for artificial agents. Traditionally, the pragmatics of ACLs take the form of interaction protocols, which only specify the order in which messages occ...
متن کامل'Pragmatic' and 'explanatory' attitudes to randomised trials.
In the early days of randomised control trials the ability to reduce confounding fromknownand unknown confounders rightly underpinned their rapid rise in methodological popularity. Ever since, however, concerns have been expressed by the clinician community and others about the difficulty of applying estimates of effects derived from randomised control trials to settings and patient populations...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Crítica (México D. F. En línea)
سال: 2004
ISSN: 1870-4905,0011-1503
DOI: 10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2004.444